In a move that can only be described as reckless, today Evanger’s Dog & Cat Food Company picked a fight with the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for exposing the company for using inedible meat in their pet food.
Where Evanger’s previously posted pug family updates regarding the recalls of their pentobarbital laced pet food, today all that information is gone.
Instead, the only information you’ll see today are these two short paragraphs (bold added):
“The FDA recently stated it believes that Evanger’s does not purchase ANY edible beef, yet in its investigation never asked a simple question, “does Evanger’s purchase edible beef.” Evanger’s does, in fact, purchase edible beef, and did purchase edible beef around the same time as the recalled beef was supplied.
Our intention was not to start an online war with the FDA, but the FDA has taken unprecedented actions specifically against Evanger’s. We will continue to post information in regards to FDA’s recent actions, but meanwhile are sharing this with our loyal customers now:
Unfortunately, the proof that Evanger’s provides is nothing more four heavily redacted documents: Three redacted invoices for the purchase of “edible beef bones” and one for “edible beef liver”; none of which provide USDA establishment numbers, nor the name of the supplier. Therefore, the information cannot be cross-checked for validity on the USDA website.
EVANGER’S BEEF WITH FDA
The battle between Evanger’s and the FDA began when the FDA posted information on regarding the meat supplier who provided them with the pentobarbital laced beef (which later Evanger’s admitted may contain horse meat as well as beef) which eventually led to the recall of all of Evanger’s and Against the Grain’s “chunk” style canned beef pet foods (bold added):
“In its recent press release announcing a limited product recall, Evanger’s Dog and Cat Food Company, Inc. stated that the beef for its Hunk of Beef product came from a “USDA approved” supplier. However, the FDA reviewed a bill of lading from Evanger’s supplier of “Inedible Hand Deboned Beef – For Pet Food Use Only. Not Fit For Human Consumption” and determined that the supplier’s facility does not have a grant of inspection from the United States Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service. The meat products from this supplier do not bear the USDA inspection mark and would not be considered human grade.”
The press release the FDA referred to was a passage in Evanger’s initial recall notice which stated (bold added):
“All Evanger’s suppliers of meat products are USDA approved. This beef supplier provides us with beef chunks from cows that are slaughtered in a USDA facility…Because we source from suppliers of meat products that are USDA approved, and no other products have had any reported problems, we are not extending the recall to other supplier lots.”
After that, the FDA added to Evanger’s and Against the Grain’s recall notices this warning: FDA Cautions Pet Owners and Caretakers Not to Feed Certain Evanger’s or Against the Grain Canned Pet Foods Due to Adulteration with Pentobarbital.
FOOT-DRAGGING OVER UPDATING RECALLS
Two weeks passed, during which time Evanger’s notified the FDA that it planned to recall all their “chunk beef” products, but a week passed and Evanger’s never provided the FDA with the updated recall notice. Eventually, the FDA became aware that Evanger’s was notifying its distributors and retailers of the new recall, but was not making the information public. In response, the FDA posted an update yesterday of Evanger’s recall for consumers and reiterated their earlier statement regarding Evanger’s false claims (bold added):
“In review of Evanger’s records, we determined that the facility identified on a bill of lading as Evanger’s supplier of “Inedible Hand Deboned Beef” further identified as “FOR PET FOOD USE ONLY. NOT FIT FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION” does not have a grant of inspection from the United States Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety Inspection Service. The meat products from this supplier do not bear the USDA inspection mark and would not be considered human grade.
When asked if any of Evanger’s beef suppliers inspected by USDA-FSIS, the FDA responded (bold added):
“The FDA’s preliminary assessment indicates that none of their suppliers are USDA-FSIS registered facilities.”
CONFUSION OVER USDA EXPORT CERTIFICATES V. USDA ESTABLISHMENT NUMBERS
The FDA explained that perhaps Evanger’s confusion about the USDA status of their meat supplier lay in the misunderstanding that their meat supplier at one point held a USDA-APHIS-assigned number to signify export certification.
Apparently, the meat supplier of the beef that was used in Evanger’s Hunk of Beef and Against the Grain Pulled Beef canned dog foods displayed a ‘USDA-APHIS number’ on its bills of lading, invoices and shipping pallets. However, the FDA found that the meat supplier’s export certification status is no longer active, thus the number is not valid.
FALSE CLAIMS AND OTHER STUPID ACTS
Throughout this drama, Evanger’s remains defiant, and despite all evidence to the contrary they insist on maintaining the claim that all their meat products are UDSA inspected. On Evanger’s product information page, they claim they “utilize USDA inspected meats.”
Joel Sher, the vice-president of Evanger’s, explained to Petfood Industry magazine that the website had been created before the Hunk of Beef product was launched. He asserted that promoting Evanger’s pet foods as human-grade was “substantially a correct statement.” However, Sher admitted that their plant is not certified to make food for human consumption.
Evidently, the company realized the human-grade claim was an incorrect statement after all and saw the wisdom of removing the false and misleading statement on their product information page regarding the human-grade claim because Evanger’s claims could have resulted in allegations of deception or false advertising by the Federal Trade Commission.
Perhaps they will see the wisdom of removing the USDA inspected meats claim as well unless they can provide evidence to support their claim that can be verified by the USDA by means of providing consumers with the USDA establishment numbers of their meat suppliers.
CONSUMER RESOURCES & INFORMATION
FDA continues to encourage consumers to report problems with Evanger’s products through the Safety Reporting Portal or by contacting a Consumer Complaint Coordinator. Please retain empty cans or partially used cans of food to facilitate the collection of specific lot number information. Additional information is available on the FDA web page, How to Report a Pet Food Complaint.
- FDA Cautions Pet Owners and Caretakers Not to Feed Certain Evanger’s or Against the Grain Canned Pet Foods
- Questions and Answers: Evanger’s Dog and Cat Food
- Company Press Release: Evanger’s Voluntarily Recalls Hunk of Beef Because Of Pentobarbital Exposure in one Batch of Food
- Company Press Release: Against The Grain Pet Food Voluntarily Recalls One Lot of Pulled Beef Due to Potential Adulteration with Pentobarbital
- FDA Form 483: Evanger’s Dog (PDF – 458KB)
- FDA Form 483: Nutripack, LLC – Markham, IL (PDF – 575KB)
Poisoned Pets | Pet Food Safety News remains free (and ad-free) and takes me many, many hours of laborious work to research and write, and thousands of dollars a year to sustain. Even if all you can spare is a few dollars – say, the cost of a can of pet food – it will help keep the Poisoned Pets’ website alive. If you find value in what I do, please consider a donation of your choosing. Thank you!