Milo’s to reformulate jerky treats, while Purina remains loyal to China

Milo’s Kitchen and Nestle Purina plan to reignite their flagging pet treat segment by reintroducing the jerky dog treats they were forced to take off the market last year following the discovery of illegal drug residue in their products imported from China just might backfire.

After years of reports of pet illness—even death—associated with consumption of jerky treats made with chicken sourced from China, Milo’s Kitchen and Nestlé Purina (the maker of Waggin’ Train treats) say that since the recall of their jerky treats last year due to illegal antibiotic residue, they have reformulated their products that this time they claim the treats are safe or at least they hope so.

While Milo’s, owned by Del Monte, has wisely decided to not risk continuing doing business with China,  Purina on the other hand, has stubbornly refused to leave China and claims that this time they are going to make sure they don’t harm any pets by using strict quality control measures.

Purina’s refusal to discontinue their reliance on high-risk foreign ingredients from foreign suppliers shows a complete disregard for American consumers with pets. Why? For one reason and one reason only: Profits. Poultry is cheaper in China.

This move is unlikely to endear customers with confidence that Purina has their pet’s well being at heart and not just their bottom line. Purina’s refusal to acknowledge any responsibility that their products may have harmed pets left thousands of consumers with only one alternative: To sue.

Although Milo’s has assured consumers their products will be made with all U.S. ingredients, rumors have surfaced that raise questions about their claim: They may be using poultry from China in products they make in the U.S., thereby circumventing the necessity of revealing the actual source of the poultry.

Manufacturers can legally use any imported ingredient (including dehydrated poultry from China) in a formula without revealing the country of origin. All they need to do is substantially modify or change the poultry in such a manner (like grinding it, for example) that it no longer is a product of China but a product processed in the U.S.

Pet food companies that continue the high risk practice of importing ingredients and products from China should be tested by an independent third-party not connected in any way to the pet food industry to assure the safety of pet products.

dog cat poisoned pets safe food warnings news recalls alerts

Poisoned Pets | Pet Food Safety News remains free (and ad-free) and takes me hundreds of hours a month to research and write, and thousands of dollars a year to sustain. Even if all you can spare is $1 it will  help keep the website alive. If you find any value in what I do, please consider a donation of your choosing. Thank you!




Mollie Morrissette

Mollie Morrissette, the author of Poisoned Pets, is an animal food safety expert and consumer advisor. Help support her work by making a donation today.

Comments (4) Write a comment

  1. Still trust Purina, folks? As so eloquently stated in this article, they continue to put their trust–and their money–in China.

    EVEN BETTER NEWS: legislation now allows chicken marked for HUMAN consumption to be sent to China for processing! We are expected to trust not only their processing standards, but that they will send back the same, undoubtedly superior (at the very least less toxic) product we provided them. How would we even recognize chicken processed AND RAISED in China, under almost nonexistent health/safety standards should they substitute an inferior product? Constant monitoring would be considered too expensive–just like monitoring the imported apple juice our children drink for arsenic.

    They are already killing our pets–will they soon be killing us, as well?


  2. Sad that Made in the USA means very little these days. Lots of consumers are unaware of this.


  3. Purina’s decision… profits. You have summed up the issue well. As is your suggestion for independent testing of imported ingredients in so-called “US made” pet food products. Consumers deserve the information in order to make informed choices. Nothing less than the health and safety of their pets is at stake. These companies that have traded lives for money deserve the amount of credit that they have earned, and that is nothing. They represent the most despicable manifestation of capitalism possible.



This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.