Toxic Molds Found in Nearly 80% of All Feed Tested

animal family

Mycotoxins are, more frequently than not, present in animal commodities and feed.

Out of the more than 3,300 samples tested during the 12-months period of 2010 a striking 78% were positive for mycotoxin presence.

Even at low levels mycotoxin ingestion may cause an array of metabolic disturbances resulting in poor animal health. These disturbances are often difficult to recognise because signs of the disease are associated with infection rather than with the toxin that predisposed the animal to infection; making a diagnosis of a mycotoxicosis difficult.

Because aflatoxins, especially aflatoxin B1, are potent carcinogens in some animals, there is interest in the effects of long-term exposure to low levels of these important mycotoxins on humans . In 1988, the IARC placed aflatoxin B1 on the list of human carcinogens. This is supported by a number of epidemiological studies done in Asia and Africa that have demonstrated a positive association between dietary aflatoxins and Liver Cell Cancer (LCC) .

The effects of chronic (as opposed to acute) mycotoxin exposure on health are poorly documented in humans, much less in animals and the economic impacts of mycotoxins have been studied primarily with respect to trade
barriers, not from the perspective of farmers and their well-being.

Mycotoxin cocktail

Bertrand Grenier from the French National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA) also underlined the fact that animals are often exposed to a cocktail of mycotoxins. The mycotoxins interact which other, explained Grenier.

Add to that, the problem of long-term exposure to combinations of mycotoxins at low concentrations may have negative effect on animal health. At the same time, current legislation and recommendations are based on individual mycotoxins and not multi-contamination.

So what is a farmer to do, who depends on a cheap source of animal feed and continued production despite the animals failing health? Why, give them that much more antibiotics, of course.

Masked mycotoxins

Another problem complicating what was originally thought of as a simple expression of the toxin in the animal, Prof Dr Sarah De Saeger from Ghent University in Belgium talked about challenges to combat masked mycotoxins.

She explained that masked (or conjugated) mycotoxins first caught attention in the late 1980s because in some cases of mycotoxicosis, clinical observations in animals did not correlate with the low mycotoxin content determined in the feed.

The unexpected high toxicity was therefore attributed to the occurrence of undetected, conjugated forms of mycotoxins that possibly hydrolyse to the precursor toxins in the digestive tract of animals.

But the research on masked mycotoxins has exponentially grown explained De Saeger. Different research groups are now focusing on the variety of masked mycotoxins, the occurrence, bioavailability and toxicity of the masked forms among others.

Contaminated feed ingredients

In a recent survey, 3,349 samples were tested and 11,195 analyses were carried out o n the most important mycotoxins in terms of agriculture and animal production – aflatoxins (Afla), zearalenone (ZON), deoxynivalenol (DON), fumonisins (FUM) and ochratoxin A (OTA).

As can be seen in the figure below, from all survey samples 28%, 42%, 58%, 55% and 26% tested positive for contamination with Afla, ZON, DON, FUM and OTA, respectively.

Biomin mycotoxin survey 2010

Biomin mycotoxin survey 2010

Biomin mycotoxin survey overall results 2010

North America’s concern with mycotoxins such as DON and ZON is widely known, especially after last year’s crops. DON was present in 87% of tested samples at worrying average levels (1,487 ppb).

In South American samples, which are mostly coming from Brazil, the trend was clear, with fumonisins as the biggest contaminant (88% positive samples) and at incredibly high average levels (2,515 ppb).


Corn by-products danger

Regarding commodities corn was the most widely tested commodity. FUM and DON were found to be the mycotoxins of higher prevalence with 75% and 72% of positive.

As expected, corn by-products such as corn gluten meal and DDGS presented very high levels of fusariotoxins such as ZON, DON and FUM, a situation which must be taken into account when using such commodities in animal diets.

Aflatoxin in dairy products

Aflatoxins have received greater attention than any other mycotoxins because of their demonstrated potent carcinogenic effect in susceptible laboratory animals and their acute toxicological effects in humans.

Since only 20ppb total aflatoxins are allowed in US human food and dairy feeds and US milk must be less than 0.5ppb, aflatoxin is well-monitored by most feed companies. Those that produce feed for use on their own stock farms often lack the resources and motivation to test each bin, tank or silo for this known carcinogen and immunosupressant. And there is no widespread systematic monitoring of US dairy products for the M1 form of aflatoxin produced by animals fed mycotoxin-contaminated feed.

Mycotoxins in pets

When we include more cereals in dry pet food the risk of mycotoxicoses also increases. Most obviously affected are dogs and cats, but mainly because cases are identified.

It is generally recognized by petfood manufacturers that mycotoxin contamination is a source of increased problems in their industry. The major mycotoxins with potential for contamination of pet foods are aflatoxins,vomitoxin, zearalenone, fumonisins, and ochratoxin A. Three genera of fungi, Aspergillus, Penicillium, and Fusarium (Gibberella), are the most frequently implicated causes of mycotoxin contamination.

Different toxicity

The primary target organ for aflatoxins is the liver with liver disease resulting from dogs ingesting aflatoxin-contaminated dog food. Little is known about the toxicity of vomitoxin, known chemically as deoxynivalenol (DON) in pets. It is known that dogs are susceptible to relatively low levels of vomitoxin and exhibit health problems similar to that seen in swine. Cats, as well as cattle, poultry, and humans, can also be affected.

There are no reports that zearalenone have caused clinical signs in dogs or cats. Fumonisins interfere with cell membrane metabolism and the signs of toxicity vary with species. The only studies conducted to demonstrate the effects of fuminosins in pet species have been in rabbits. Ochratoxin A is a nephrotoxin (i.e. toxic to the kidneys) and is also teratogenic (i.e. causes fetal malformation during the first three months of pregnancy) in all species tested. It also impairs the immune system and is a suspected carcinogen.

Following the links in the food chain

With exception of aflatoxins, Federal and State requirements for routine testing of these mycotoxins are entirely
inadequate to follow these poisons through the food chain. Even in the case of aflatoxins, on-farm testing is rarely applied as regulatory focus falls on feeds and foods offered for sale after off-farm storage and processing.

What remains unknown is how much of the mycotoxin that reaches livestock is transferred to food products or measurements of the incidence of aflatoxin and zearalenone incidence in snack foods, milled grains, dairy and meat products produced.

With this information, were it known, we could trace contamination forward and back through the food
chain. The first impact would be awareness on the part of the feed and food industry, the second would be reductions based on recommendations of known steps to reduce contamination and the final step would be experimental implementation of new techniques to keep food safe for the next generation of animals and their owners.

And finally, a reminder of the deadly consequences of pet food contaminated with aflatoxin that affected hundreds, if not thousands of pets:

Dogs keep dying: Too many owners remain unaware of toxic dog food

By Susan S. Lang, Cornell University, January 2006

Even though Diamond, Country Value and Professional brand dog foods have been recalled for containing highly toxic aflatoxins, they have caused an estimated 100 dog deaths in recent weeks, say Cornell University veterinarians, who are growing increasingly alarmed. Some kennels and consumers around the nation remain unaware of the tainted food, which may have been shipped to more than two dozen countries, and as a result, they continue to give dogs food containing a lethal toxin.

To better screen affected dogs so they can be treated as soon as possible, Cornell veterinarians report that they now have a new test, adapted from one used in humans, to accurately assess aflatoxin poisoning in dogs (see companion story). Currently, about two-thirds of dogs that show symptoms after eating the tainted food die.

ill dog 
This cocker spaniel, Sad Sack, succumbed to aflatoxin poisoning recently at Cornell’s Hospital for Animals.

Entire kennels have been wiped out, and because of the holiday these past few weeks, the dispersal of recall information was disrupted,” says Sharon Center, a professor of veterinary medicine who specializes in liver function and disease at the College of Veterinary Medicine at Cornell, which is emerging as a central clearinghouse for information about the dog food poisoning.

The Cornell Vet College is continually updating its Web site to keep the public and veterinarians informed as new information on the poisonings emerge. Cornell’s Animal Health Diagnostic Center (AHDC) is analyzing blood and liver samples from sick dogs around the country, testing suspected dog food, conducting autopsies and collecting as many livers as possible from dead dogs to confirm cause of death, tracking dogs that have died and following up on the health of dogs that survive the food poisoning. The AHDC has information for veterinarians on its Web site http://diaglab.vet.cornell.edu/news.asp.

We suspect that dogs have been dying since November, perhaps even October, but it took the perfect storm of circumstances to get the diagnosis,” said Karyn Bischoff, the veterinary toxicologist at Cornell who first identified aflatoxin as the culprit in the recent wave of deaths.

Trying to save dogs

Over the recent holiday weeks, Center and her staff worked around-the-clock to try to save the 17 poisoned dogs admitted to Cornell’s Hospital for Animals. “I’ve been working with liver disease in dogs for 30 years, and I’ve never seen such miserably ill dogs,” said Center, noting that severely affected dogs suffer from intractable vomiting and internal bleeding. “Despite our understanding of this complex toxin, we have no direct antidote for this poisoning. This has been an immensely sad holiday and one that will leave an indelible mark on the owners that lost their cherished family members.”

Of those 17 dogs, Center euthanized 12 when it became clear they could not survive, and the remaining four were released, though the Vet College continues to treat new cases. Dogs that have survived consumed a smaller amount of the food than dogs that died, Center said. “Some dogs were stealing food from the kitchen counter. Others just stopped eating the food and begged for treats. Unfortunately, some owners used gravy and other mixers to entice their dogs to consume what they thought was safe, quality dog food.

Many dog owners I’ve talked to feel responsible for poisoning their beloved dogs,” said Bischoff.

Although only about two dozen animal deaths have been officially linked to the tainted pet food, Center and Bischoff know that many more have died or become ill from the tainted food, based on their many communications with veterinarians as far south as Florida.

Every day, we’re hearing reports from veterinarians in the East and Southeast who have treated dogs that have died from liver damage this past month or so,” said Center. “We’re also concerned about the long-term health of dogs that survive as well as dogs that have eaten the tainted food but show no clinical signs.” She suspects that surviving dogs may develop chronic liver disease, perhaps liver cancer, and that many dogs that ate the tainted food appear healthy are nevertheless victims of liver damage.

Yet many dog and kennel owners remain unaware that some 19 brands of Diamond, Country Value and Professional dog foods have been recalled.

Screening ill dogs

Early signs that a dog has been poisoned by aflatoxin include lethargy, loss of appetite and vomiting and, later, orange-colored urine and jaundice (a yellowing of the eyes, gums and nonpigmented skin that reflects substantial liver injury). Severely affected dogs produce a blood-tinged vomit and bloody or blackened stools. “Since dogs can take several days to three weeks to exhibit serious signs of illness, all animals that consumed recalled lots of food should be examined by a veterinarian as early as possible,” Center said. “Physical exams and blood tests are necessary to differentiate dogs that have been poisoned from those that have not. Unfortunately, the latent onset of signs may require that an individual dog be evaluated several times.”

Cornell veterinarians have verified diagnostic tests enabling detection of seriously poisoned dogs. Aflatoxin curtails the production of cholesterol and many proteins that profoundly affect blood clotting. A minimum screening profile should assess the liver enzyme ALT to detect damage to the liver, serum cholesterol, total bilirubin concentration and the activity of the anticoagulant proteins antithrombin III (ATIII) and protein C. The coagulation protein tests, which have been adapted for dogs by Cornell researchers, have high value in detecting affected dogs but require collection of a special blood sample (citrated plasma sample) and an assessment by Cornell’s Animal Health Diagnostic Center.

Any dog suspected of aflatoxin poisoning should also have a liver specimen sent to Cornell to definitively confirm the pathologic changes in the liver unique for aflatoxin toxicosis, such as fatty degeneration of individual cells.

Even if dogs show no signs of illness, if they have eaten the affected food, they should have blood tests submitted to detect liver injury,” Center stressed. “Dogs that show positive results on any of the above tests should be prescribed liver protectants for two months.” For more details, veterinarians should check the Cornell Vet College Web site.

Owners also should take cats that might have eaten contaminated dog food to a vet. Two cats that may have eaten the tainted dog food have died, but no cause of death was determined.

To send dog food to Cornell for aflatoxin testing, veterinarians should send a two-pound sample comprising about five handfuls of food pulled from different parts of the bag. If the food is negative, that does not rule out aflatoxin exposure, Bischoff stressed, because it may take days or weeks for dogs to become ill and the contaminated food may be long gone. The toxin may also be unevenly dispersed through the food. However, only a liver biopsy can definitively determine cause of death. Center requests that livers from dogs that have died recently from liver damage or suspected food poisoning be sent to Cornell for evaluation of pathologic changes. Veterinarians should check the Vet College Web site for information on sample submission.

The Cornell veterinarians also recommend that any suspected food be labeled as poison and stored away from animals and children. Save labels with lot numbers from bags. Until further information emerges, if food was stored in a wooden container, the container should be destroyed. Plastic and metal containers should be sanitized with bleach.

To report animals that might have died recently from the food poisoning, send an e-mail to diagcenter@cornell.edu, and the researchers will follow-up with a questionnaire.

Related:
References:
Food Chain Mycotoxins 2010: Threats and Solutions D. Brown, Department of Animal Science, Cornell University
All About Feed Biomin mycotoxin survey 2010
donate poisoned pets

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Mollie Morrissette

Mollie Morrissette, author of Poisoned Pets, is an animal food safety expert and advisor to AAFCO. Help support her work by making a donation today.

Comments (3) Write a comment

  1. I found your site when I went to the WordPress Global Tag pg. for posts tagged with “mold”. There ware problems using this tag and others because just like CNBC, WordPress is censoring certain topics by pretty much manipulating some tags so they don’t work. Or in my case taking the code out of the template so tags are not published with post. But what I wanted to ask was what do you feed your pets? I have a pomeranian and have reasons to believe she is very sensitive to mycotoxins in food.

    Reply

    • Katy,

      Wow, that’s scary about the mold tag problem. I’ll have to look into that. Did you know about CNBC canceling it’s scheduled programming of the documentary about the pet food industry? The stinkers.

      Yes, molds are an endemic problem with grains. I suggest finding a brand that does not contain grains. However, that is not to say that other ingredients, such as sweet potatoes or yams, for example, could not be moldy as well. Remember the 200 hundred cows that dropped dead recently? It turns out it was a result of moldy yams/sweet potatoes in their feed.

      Basically, because the feed/food industry uses waste products from the human food industry, chances are, a great deal of the ingredients are compromised in some way or another.

      To be sure that you are not feeding your animal anything that could potentially harm them, you have several choices:
      1.) Make the food yourself, it’s not as hard as you think! Check out the highly respected http://www.balanceit.com for recipes.
      2.) Try the brand Honest Kitchen. They are legally certified human food grade. It is an absolutely fantastic company! I cannot recommend them highly enough! They have a raw dehydrated mix, called Bark, for dogs and Prowl for cats. http://www.honestkitchen.com
      3.) Supplement your current diet with Certified Organic meat, preferably byson (buffalo), chicken, eggs (whites cooked, yolk soft). I don’t personally recommend beef, fish or pork for numerous reasons. I buy my meat & eggs from farms I have personally visited, to make sure they are treating their animals well and caring and feeding them properly. These days you can’t even trust the USDA’s Certified Organic Program. It is a disgrace.

      I personally feed my fur babies raw meat (buffalo mostly) and lightly poached eggs with Honest Kitchen’s Prowl. I have bought Halo, Primal (a frozen raw food from San Francisco, made by two former chefs) and Natural Planet which is Certified Organic by Oregon Tilth. Technically, pet foods cannot to be certified organic, but manufacturers are getting sick and tired of waiting for the USDA’s NOP to get off their butt and change the rules. I have read great things about a company called Bravo! on the East Coast. They sell a real human grade raw diet for pets. I live in California, so the shipping is ridiculous for feeding 8 cats. They were the only company, besides Honest Kitchen, to allow two book authors full access to their manufacturing facility. The books Bravo! was featured in were Dog Food Nation and Feed Your Pets Right.

      Hope this helps!

      Mollie

      Finally for the BEST advice and information on the internet about the

      Reply

Love it? Hate it? Tell us! We want to know.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.