Top US pet foods test positive for aflatoxin, melamine and cyanuric acid

A consumer organization in Hong Kong found contaminates in several top US pet food brands. The Consumer Council found trace amounts of aflatoxin, melamine and cyanuric acid in both dry dog and cat foods.

Brands

Aflatoxin

Melamine

Cyanuric acid

Purina One

Yes

1st Choice

Yes

Pedrigee

Yes

No Frills

Yes

Kitekat

Yes

Hill’s Science Diet

Yes

Avoderm

Yes

Solid Gold

Yes

Iams

Yes

Purina Pro Plan

Yes

1st Choice

Yes

Aflatoxin found

Trace amount of aflatoxin B1, ranging from 1.0 to 2.0 µg/kg dry pet food were found in 7 dry pet foods. The levels of aflatoxin found in the samples are all within the safety limits established by the European Union Commission Regulation.

EU maximum limits

The EU sets the maximum amount of aflatoxin B1 in animal feeds at 0.01 ppm (10 µg/kg) in complementary and complete feed, and at 0.02 ppm (20 µg/kg or .02 mg/kg) in feed materials.

FDA action levels

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) also sets action levels for the regulation of aflatoxin content in animal feeds and feeding ingredients. Action levels for aflatoxin in human food and animal feed and animal feed ingredients vary, from 0.5 ppb in milk up to 20 ppb in all other foods and animal feed.

Maximum residue levels allowed in the US

Maximum residue level for aflatoxin B1 in animal feeds and feed ingredients. 0.02 ppm(.02 mg/kg)
Maximum residue level for melamine and related compounds (including cyanuric acid) 2.5 ppm(2.5mg/kg)

Melamine & cyanuric acid

2 US brands were found with the contaminant melamine and 2 others with cyanuric acid, both in trace amounts. The report indicated that,

“All samples in the test were found to be in compliance with the requirement.”

Residue allowed

The United Nations’ food standards body, Codex Alimentarius Commission, the FDA and the EU has set the maximum amount of melamine allowed in powdered infant formula to 1 mg/kg and the amount of the chemical allowed in other foods and animal feed to 2.5 mg/kg.

Essentially nontoxic

Cyanuric acid is classified as essentially nontoxic. in fact, FDA permits a certain amount of cyanuric acid to be present in some feed additives and drinking water. Cyanuric acid is an FDA-accepted component of feed-grade biuret, a ruminant feed additive. The additive can legally contain up to 30% of cyanuric acid (and triuret).

Deadly combination

However, when cyanuric acid is present together with melamine, which by itself is another low-toxicity substance, they may form extremely insoluble crystals, leading to formation of kidney stones and potentially causing kidney failure and death—as evidenced in dogs and cats during the 2007 pet food contamination and in children during the 2008 Chinese milk scandal cases.

Even though none of the foods tested were found to contain melamine and cyanuric acid together, and were found individually in the samples tested, the danger arises when both contaminants are consumed together.  Exposure to both substances may lead to formation of crystals, resulting in blockage of tubules in kidneys that may cause acute renal failure in animals.

To avoid the hazard do not combine pet food brands together. Or better yet, make your own pet food.

The bright side?

All samples were found to be free of Salmonella and E. Coli O157.

To find out more, visit here and here

donate poisoned pets

Mollie Morrissette

Mollie Morrissette, author of Poisoned Pets, is an animal food safety expert and advisor to AAFCO. Help support her work by making a donation today.

Comments (6) Write a comment

  1. Pingback: About China and Melamine in Pet Food | Essentially Dogs | Essentially Dogs

  2. Fabulous article. I have written about this subject in my blog essentiallydogs.com. I included a video from the FDA that confirms that the melamine and cyanuric acide is what is killing our dogs. The FDA has worked so diligently to scare us about salmonella which distracted people from the real issues. Thank you for the fabulous article. http://www.essentiallydogs.com/about-china-and-melanine-in-pet-food. I just added a link to your article into mine. Thank you for the information.

    Reply

  3. Thank you Mollie- i will share on Fb. It’s all beyond scary these days… I appreciate your continued work on the topic. xo

    Reply

  4. I’m going to move me and my cats to Europe! Judging from the differences between their allowable amounts and ours in the US, their government and animal food regulators seem to be far more concerned about the effects of contaminants than ours do!

    Reply

  5. Truly horrific. I feel that we are (well… haven’t we always been? … aren’t we always?) on the cusp of another disaster as 2007… it is just a matter of time… just a matter of the “right ingredients,” as you suggest. And little to nothing has really changed… domestic animals, no matter how important they may be to us, are legally considered “property,” and there is little to no consequence of injuring or killing them. So-called “class action suits” are merely considered a cost of doing business (gee, Diamond just had to publish another page on the topic… they’ve allotted more than $5M since 2007 for food contamination), and these companies never have to cop to responsibility or wrongdoing.

    Your last comment, on “the bright side,” did give me a chuckle, though! Very funny finish!

    Reply

    • What is so disturbing is that melamine has NO business being in food. Molds – well, they can and do happen naturally, but melamine is an intentional additive. If pf manufacturers are aware that cyanuric acid could be in some of their commodities – shouldn’t they be worried sick that others don’t contain melamine?

      You are exactly correct – it is another disaster waiting to happen (if it isn’t occurring already). Yet, despite the alarm it will cause, the law allows trace elements of just about anything (including feces) in many foods, including the ones for humans.

      Long term studies of the chronic effect of consuming trace amounts of many contaminates have not been done, therefore we have no idea of the long-term effects of consuming some of these chemicals. It is generally understood that the long term effects of consuming low levels of aflatoxins is unhealthy, but I am unaware of any studies that have been done.

      Meanwhile, unless those studies have been done showing conclusively a causal relationship the laws are unlikely to change. Think about GMOs, for example.

      Reply

SHARE YOUR COMMENTS WITH US. YOUR OPINION MATTERS.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.